Albrecht v. Thieme
EMIL ALBRECHT v. ALBIN THIEME
Albrecht v. Thieme, 118 A. 926 (N.J. 1922)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justiee Katzenbach in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance— Vim Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, White, Heppenheimee, Williams, Gardner, Ackebson, Yan Buskirk, JJ. 12.
For reversal — TJone.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.