Pennsylvania Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, LESSEE v. STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT AND THE MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
This ease was before the Supreme Court on certiorari to review an assessment of taxes made by Jeisey City against the prosecutor-appellant, which was reviewed by the stare board of taxes ana assessment and afEimed by that body. The Supreme Court affirmed the state board. As there was evidence to support the finding of facts made by the Supreme Court in affirming the decision under consideration in that tribunal, that fin a mg is not renewable in this court. Long Dock v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 90 N. J. L. 701.
The judgment of the Supreme Court reviewed here must, therefore, necessarily be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Black, Katzenbacr, White, Williams, Gardner, Ackbrson, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.