TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fort v. Reid Ice Cream Co.

ALBERT FORT, AN INFANT, BY LOUIS FORT, HIS NEXT FRIEND v. REID ICE CREAM COMPANY

Fort v. Reid Ice Cream Co., 119 A. 638 (N.J. 1923)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 1, 1923
Judges
Pee
Citations
119 A. 63898 N.J.L. 5591923 N.J. LEXIS 250
Cited by 6

Opinion of the Court — Pee

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →
1928: 11937: 11942: 11949: 11951: 11957: 119282026peak 1928 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Werebeychick v. Morris Land Development Co., Inc.142 A. 739 (Conn. 1928)
  2. Bergquist v. Penterman134 A.2d 20 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)
  3. Cleary v. City of Camden192 A. 29 (N.J. 1937)
  4. Girard v. Kabatznick24 A.2d 257 (Conn. 1942)
  5. Marx v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey69 A.2d 748 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949) · Dissent
  6. Corrao v. West Jersey Corp.80 A.2d 439 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)

Most recent

  1. Bergquist v. Penterman134 A.2d 20 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)
  2. Corrao v. West Jersey Corp.80 A.2d 439 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)
  3. Marx v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey69 A.2d 748 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949) · Dissent
  4. Girard v. Kabatznick24 A.2d 257 (Conn. 1942)
  5. Cleary v. City of Camden192 A. 29 (N.J. 1937)
  6. Werebeychick v. Morris Land Development Co., Inc.142 A. 739 (Conn. 1928)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list