TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Pietsch v. Stirling Home Builders, Inc.

NELLIE Y. PIETSCH v. STIRLING HOME BUILDERS, INCORPORATED

Pietsch v. Stirling Home Builders, Inc., 119 A. 926 (N.J. 1923)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 1, 1923
Judges
Pee
Citations
119 A. 92698 N.J.L. 5691923 N.J. LEXIS 256

Opinion of the Court — Pee

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justic-t Katzenbach in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bekgen, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Bus-kirk, JJ. 13.

For reversal — JSTone.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1950: 119502026peak 1950 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kahle v. Amtorg Trading Corp.93 F. Supp. 405 (D.N.J. 1950)

Most recent

  1. Kahle v. Amtorg Trading Corp.93 F. Supp. 405 (D.N.J. 1950)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list