Powers v. Standard Oil Co.
LEROY POWERS, ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF MARY CATHERINE POWERS v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY AND FRED STAUB
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Justice Mintum in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, IKatzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Van Busicirk, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
("As a practical matter, legal responsibility must be limited to those causes which are so closely connected with the result and of such significance that the law is justified in imposing liability.")
Cited by 30 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.