State v. Sakowicz
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, IN ERROR v. STANLEY SAKOWICZ, IN ERROR
State v. Sakowicz, 125 A. 322 (N.J. 1923)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Ctjriam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, ICalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.