In re Barbey's Estate
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
THOMAS, S.
The money deposited by the decedent in savings banks in form “in trust” for his several children was his own property. No contract obligation with relation to such deposits existed. No absolute transfers to the trust beneficiaries, by delivery of the bank books or otherwise, was shown; and it is not claimed that the fact of the deposits was made known by the decedent to the beneficiaries or any of them. Upon these facts the depositor retained a power to revoke the trusts at his pleasure by making withdrawals of money for his own use, and the rights of the beneficiaries are restricted to the balances remaining at his death. Matter of Totten, 179 N. Y. 112 , 71 N. E. 748 , 70 L. R. A. 711.
The depositor is also presumed to have intended that each trust shall come to an end and that the fund shall revert to his estate if the beneficiary does not survive him. Matter of U. S. Trust Co., 117 App. Div. 178 , 102 N. Y. Supp. 271 , affirmed 189 N. Y. 500 , 81 N. E. 1177 . In other words, the decedent reserved to himself all of the rights of ownership in the deposits until his death, and granted only interests “intended to take effect in possession or enjoyment at or after such death.” Such interests are identical with those passing by a will. The transfers are within the purpose and express language of the statute and they are taxable. Matter of Green, 153 N. Y. 223 , 47 N. E. 292 ; Matter of Brandreth, 169 N. Y. 437 , 62 N. E. 563 , *726 58 L. R. A. 148, reversing 58 App. Div. 575 , 69 N. Y. Supp. 142 ; Matter of Cornell, 170 N. Y. 423 , 63 N. E. 445 , modifying 66 App. Div. 162 , 73 N. Y. Supp. 32 ; Matter of- Bostwick, 160 N. Y. 489 , 55 N. E. 208 ; Matter of Skinner, 45 Misc. Rep. 559 , 92 N. Y. Supp. 972 ; Matter of Sharer, 36 Misc. Rep. 502 , 73 N. Y. Supp. 1057 .
The provisions made by the will in favor of the widow being expressly stated to be in lieu of dower, and the widow having elected to_ accept them, the estate is not to be diminished, for purposes of taxation, by the value of her dower right. Matter of Riemann, 42 Misc. Rep. 648 , 87 N. Y. Supp. 731 ; Matter of Gould, 156 N. Y. 423 , 51 N. E. 287 ; Matter of Wolfe, 89 App. Div. 349 , 85 N. Y. Supp. 949 , affirmed 179 N. Y. 599 , 72 N. E. 1152 .
The order appealed from must be affirmed. Settle order on notice.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.