TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Townsend v. Babcock

Townsend v. Babcock, 18 Wend. 334 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1836)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Supreme Court · State Trial Courts
Decided
December 15, 1836
Citations
18 Wend. 334
Summary
In this case, a motion for re-taxation of costs was denied without costs, and costs were refused, solely on the ground that the papers in opposition to the motion were unnecessarily voluminous. The judge observed that the court would pass upon the question, and not leave it to the taxing officer to determine what facts were necessarily stated.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Where papers in opposition to a motion are unnecessarily voluminous, costs will not be allowed, though the motion be denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1848–1849: 11854–1855: 11872–1873: 118482026peak 1848 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Christmas v. Russell81 U.S. (14 Wall.) 69 (1872)
  2. Kimball v. Donald20 Mo. 577 (1855)
  3. Hoyt v. Story3 Barb. 262 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1848)

Most recent

  1. Christmas v. Russell81 U.S. (14 Wall.) 69 (1872)
  2. Kimball v. Donald20 Mo. 577 (1855)
  3. Hoyt v. Story3 Barb. 262 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1848)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list