Braudie v. Richland County
Braudie v. Richland Cnty., 64 S.E.2d 248 (S.C. 1951)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The order of Honorable Wm. H. Grimball has been carefully considered in the light, of the record and the exceptions, and we find no error.
Let the order be reported as the judgment of this Court.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(wherein the Supreme Court held that an appearance before the County Board of Commissioners and a letter to the county attorney constituted substantial compliance with a statute requiring the filing of a verified claim as a prerequisite to suit)
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.