TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Czura

In the Matter of Walter Murphy CZURA

In re Czura, 306 S.E.2d 591 (S.C. 1983)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina · State Highest Courts
Decided
August 8, 1983
Docket
No. 21967
Citations
306 S.E.2d 591279 S.C. 2911983 S.C. LEXIS 346

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

This attorney disciplinary matter is before the Court as a result of a recommendation of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, speaking through its Executive Committee, that the Respondent, Walter M. Czura, be disbarred from the practice of law. We accept the recommendation.

Heretofore, on February 18, 1982, we temporarily suspended the Respondent. The case has now been tried before a Hearing Panel and reviewed by the Executive Committee and is now before this Court for final disposition.

The Complaint filed against the Respondent alleged that on January 13,1982, the Respondent pled guilty to one count of an indictment in Federal Court, which charged him with violating Title 21U. S. C. § 963 by conspiring to import a quantity of marijuana in excess of one thousand pounds into the Hilton Head area of South Carolina. It alleged that this conduct constituted a serious crime in violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility and of the Rules of Disciplinary Procedure.

Article V of the Constitution of this state imposes upon this Court the duty of determining both admissions to the bar and sanctions to be imposed in cases of misconduct. We agree with the Executive Committee that the Respondent, Walter M. Czura, has been guilty of misconduct and that he should be and is, hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in South Carolina.

It is ordered that the Respondent, within five days from the notice of the filing of this order, return his certificate to practice to the Clerk of the Court at the Supreme Court in Columbia, South Carolina.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1986: 11987: 11990: 119862026peak 1986 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Czura v. Supreme Court of South Carolina632 F. Supp. 267 (D.S.C. 1986)
  2. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Wright1990 OK 45, 792 P.2d 1171
  3. Czura v. Supreme Court of South Carolina813 F.2d 644 (4th Cir. 1987)

Most recent

  1. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Wright1990 OK 45, 792 P.2d 1171
  2. Czura v. Supreme Court of South Carolina813 F.2d 644 (4th Cir. 1987)
  3. Czura v. Supreme Court of South Carolina632 F. Supp. 267 (D.S.C. 1986)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list