TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

West Teneessee Agricultural & Mechanical Ass'n v. Madison

West Teneessee Agricultural and Mechanical Association v. R. P. Madison

West Teneessee Agric. & Mech. Ass'n v. Madison, 77 Tenn. 407 (1882)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Tennessee Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 15, 1882
Judges
Deaderick
Citations
77 Tenn. 407
Headnotes
1. PLEADINGS AND PRACTICE. Attachment. Affidavit. Amendment. Plea in abatement. An affidavit for attachment before a justice of the peace not subscribed, though certified by the justice before whom made as sworn to and subscribed before him, does not render the attachment void. The-defect may be cured by amendment.’ An appearance and plea to the' merits is a waiver of the defect in the indictment. 2. Same. Same. If the defendant appears and pleads to the merits before the justice of the peace, it is too late to file a plea in abatement in the circuit court to which an appeal has been taken.
Summary
FROM MADISON. Appeal in error from the Law Court of Madison county. H. W. McCorry, J.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Deaderick

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Deaderick, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff, by original attachment, sued defehdant for $75, before a justice of the peace of Madison county. The writ was issued upon the affidavit of W. P. Robertson, president, that said Madison was indebted to said association, etc. It is regular in form, except *408 that it is not subscribed by Robertson, although .the justice attests that it was sworn to and subscribed before him. Bond was executed, and the writ issued and levied on two horses and a wagon. About a month after the levy, the defendant entered his appearance and waived “the time provided for in the order of publication,” and both parties agreed to go into the trial of the case, and after hearing the evidence the justice gave judgment for plaintiff, and ordered the sale of the attached property for its satisfaction.

From this judgment defendant appealed to court, and executed a bond replevying the property, conditioned to pay the debt and costs in the event he should be cast therein.

Upon the return of the justice’s papers into court, the defendant filed a plea in abatement, denying that “he has removed himself out of the State so that the ordinary process of law cannot be served upon him.” The plaintiff moved to strike out said plea, because not filed before the justice who tried the cause. This motion was refused, and upon trial the court dischargd the attachment, but rendered judgment for plaintiff for the debt, and defendant has appealed to this court.

Defendant insists that the affidavit not having been signed, rendered all subsequent proceedings void, and that it does not purport to have been 'made by one authorized to make it. It purports to have been made by W. P. Robertson, Prest. The abbreviation is the usual one for the word president, and the affidavit sufficiently indicates that it was made by the president *409 of the association. When the affidavit was actually sworn to, and the clerk fails to attest it, it is not fatal, and the defect may be cured by amendment ; so, also, an affidavit certified to be signed, without actual signature, may be amended: 1 King’s Dig., 164-5. These omissions are irregular and amendable, and do not render the proceedings void, if defendant appears and pleads. Such appearance and answer or plea to the merits is a waiver of such defects in the affidavit: 12 Heis., 273; lb., 628. If exception had been taken before the justice, the omission could have been corrected.

Matter in abatement is waived by plea, to the merits or entering an appearance: 1 Hum., 333 ; 10 Hum., 455 ; 3 Sneed, 358 ; 10 Heis., 504. Appearance and pleading to the merits give jurisdiction of the person in all tribunals. If this be done before a justice, it will be too late to except in the court above: 1 Hum., 332 .

It is in the institution of the suit, before the justice, that the suit begins, and there the plea in abatement must be pleaded.

In this case it appears defendent entered his appearance, and agreed to go to trial on the merits.It was, therefore, too late for him to file a plea in abatement in the court to which, he appealed, not having made an application to do so before the justice. We are of opinion, therefore, that his Honor erred, in refusing to strike out such plea, and reverse his judgment in this particular, and proceeding to render such judgment as he should have rendered direct, that said *410 plea in abatement be stricken out. And bis judgment for the debt and costs being affirmed, a judgment will be entered here against said Madison and his sureties, on the replevin bond, for the amount of said judgment and costs, and the. costs of this court.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1953: 11998: 119532026peak 1953 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Keith978 S.W.2d 861 (Tenn. 1998)
  2. Lillard v. Yellow Mfg. Acceptance Corp.263 S.W.2d 520 (Tenn. 1953)

Most recent

  1. State v. Keith978 S.W.2d 861 (Tenn. 1998)
  2. Lillard v. Yellow Mfg. Acceptance Corp.263 S.W.2d 520 (Tenn. 1953)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list