TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Evans v. State

Andy and Mack Evans v. State

Evans v. State, 85 Tenn. 269 (1886)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Tennessee Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 12, 1886
Judges
Snodgrass
Citations
85 Tenn. 269
Headnotes
Sheriff’s Fees. Removing prisoners from one comity to another. A Sheriff removing two prisoners from “one county to another” at a single trip is entitled, under Code (M. & V.), % ¡316, sub-sec. 28, to ten cents “per mile going and returning” for each prisoner. Code cited: ? 5316 (M. & V.), ¡Í 4564 (T. & S.)
Summary
Motion to retax the Sheriff’s costs, which had been stricken out by the Attorney-General.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Snodgrass

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Snodgrass, J.

The Sheriff of Jefferson County brought the plaintiffs in error from the jail in Dandridge to this Court for trial. In the bill of cost he was alloAved mileage going and returning for one of the prisoners only, and he moves to retax the cost so as to allow him mileage for the other also.

The Code, § 5316, sub-sec. 28, provides that the Sheriff is alloAved to demand and receive, for re *270 moving any criminal from one county to another, per mile, going and returning, ten cents.

It is agreed that the Sheriff made but one trip; and the question is, is he entitled to the compensation for the trip, without reference to the number of prisoners brought] or. to compensation of ten cents per mile for each prisoner removed on said trip, no other compensation for expense being allowed? The statute intends the compensation to be for each criminal removed, without reference to the number of trips required or taken in the removal.

The cost will be retaxed accordingly.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1897: 118972026peak 1897 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Steenerson v. Board of County Commissioners71 N.W. 687 (Minn. 1897)

Most recent

  1. Steenerson v. Board of County Commissioners71 N.W. 687 (Minn. 1897)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list