TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bailey v. State

Bailey v. State, 32 S.W. 250 (Tenn. 1895)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Tennessee Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 3, 1895
Judges
Caldwell
Citations
32 S.W. 25095 Tenn. 391
Headnotes
Supbbme Court. Jurisdiction. This Court acquires no jurisdiction where an appeal is prayed, hut not granted, and will strike the cause from the docket. Code construed: $ 3876 (M. & V.); § 3259 (T. & S.). Cases cited and approved: Craig-head v. Rankin, 6 Bax., 131; O’Riley v. Zollieoffer, 4 Yer.. 298; Childress v. Marks, 2 Bax., 12; Snyder v. Summers, 1 Lea, 482.
Summary
FROM SEVIER. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Sevier County. W. R. Hicks, Judge.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Caldwell

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Caldwell, J.

B. B. Bailey was convicted and fined fifty dollars, in the Circuit Court of Sevier County, for unlawfully carrying arms. He has appealed to this Court, by counsel, asking a reversal and new trial.

*392 The case is not properly in this Court, because no appeal was granted in the Court below. All that appears in the transcript on the subject of appeal, is found in an entry upon the minutes of that Court, which is as follows: “From the action of the Court in refusing to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial, the defendant excepts, and prays an appeal to the Supreme Court, sitting at Knoxville.” That entry is fatally defective, in that it fails to show, additionally, that the prayer for appeal was granted. It shows the requisite action on the part of the defendant, but no action, in response, on the- part of the Court. Both prayer offered by the former and granted by the latter, were indispensable. Code (M. & V.), § 3876; History of a Lawsuit (Martin’s Ed.), Secs. 280, 287; Craighead v. Rankin, 6 Bax., 131 ; O'Riley v. Zollicoffer, 4 Yer., 298 ; 2 Bax., 12 ; 1 Lea, 482 ; 2 Enc. Pl. & Pr., 203-4.

Strike the case from the docket.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1959: 11960: 11974: 119592026peak 1959 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Green v. State512 S.W.2d 641 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1974)
  2. Gray v. State336 S.W.2d 22 (Tenn. 1960)
  3. Spencer v. Dixie Finance Co.327 S.W.2d 301 (Tenn. 1959)

Most recent

  1. Green v. State512 S.W.2d 641 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1974)
  2. Gray v. State336 S.W.2d 22 (Tenn. 1960)
  3. Spencer v. Dixie Finance Co.327 S.W.2d 301 (Tenn. 1959)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list