TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co.

Central Trust Co. and another v. Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co. and others

Cent. Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co., 23 F. 675 (1885)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Historical Federal Courts
Decided
May 1, 1885
Judges
Brewer, Orally
Citations
23 F. 6751885 U.S. App. LEXIS 1970
Headnotes
Receiverships—Attorney’s Fees. Wliore, during the pendency of a receivership, counsel for the complainant present claims for professional services for allowance, they will not be allowed the full value of their services, but only a part, thereof; and the balance will be allowed to stand until the litigation is disposed of, and the court can see whether or not the property in the receiver’s hands will suffice to pay all expenses, and the court will then decide what final allowance should be made.
Summary
In the Matter of the Application of Messrs. Green, Burnett & Humphreys, for an allowance for professional services as attorneys for the petitioner in Wabash & St. L. & P. Ry. Co. v. Central Trust Co. and others.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Brewerorally

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Brewer, J., {orally.)

It is not because we think the counsel have not earned the amount reported by the master in their favor that we do not sustain this report in full; but we do not believe in the policy or propriety, pending a receivership, of making a large allowance to parties who are employed as officers of the court, or in looking after the interests of clients in that connection. They should wait until the matter comes to a close, and then their bills, as a whole, should be presented. The court can then look at them, and pass upon the question as to whether they are correct or not. It makes a great difference, practically, in the administration of affairs, whether parties present bills for two or three thousand dollars every three or four months, or at the end of the litigation for eight or ten thousand dollars. Wo do not mean that counsel shall go without compensation as the ease progresses, because they cannot afford to; but still these intermediate allowances will always be small, and will not be in the way of a determination of what the services up to that time are really worth, or what they should bo at the final disposition of the case. They will be simply in view of the necessities, so to speak, of counsel pending litigation; and while the master in this case recommends an allowance of $6,000, the order will be that these gentlemen be paid $2,000 on account. The matter will stand over until we come to the final disposition of th.e Wabash Case, and then all fees and claims will be presented, and it will be seen whether there are funds enough in the Wabash road to pay the expenses.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1912: 119122026peak 1912 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Buell v. Kanawha Lumber Corp.201 F. 762 (E.D.S.C. 1912)

Most recent

  1. Buell v. Kanawha Lumber Corp.201 F. 762 (E.D.S.C. 1912)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list