TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bennett v. OFFICEMAX, INC.

Bennett v. Officemax, Inc., 730 N.W.2d 737 (Mich. 2007)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Michigan Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 11, 2007
Docket
No. 132447
Judges
Markman
Citations
730 N.W.2d 737478 Mich. 8512007 Mich. LEXIS 988

Opinion

730 N.W.2d 737 (2007)

William E. BENNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

OFFICEMAX, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 132447. COA No. 269562.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 11, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 29, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARKMAN, J., states as follows:

I would deny leave to appeal and assess $250 in costs against the plaintiff and in favor of the defendant under MCR 7.316(D)(1) for filing a vexatious appeal. I would also bar plaintiff from submitting additional filings in this Court until he offers proof that he has paid all outstanding court-imposed sanctions. By letter to the Clerk of this Court dated February 18, 2007, plaintiff has indicated that he may not pay sanctions imposed by this Court and the lower courts in prior cases.

CORRIGAN, J., joins the statement of MARKMAN, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list