TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Whited v. Warden

Robert D. WHITED, Jr. v. WARDEN, LAWRENCEVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER

Whited v. Warden, 85 F. App'x 888 (4th Cir. 2004)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 15, 2004
Docket
No. 03-7326
Judges
Duncan, Luttig, Shedd
Citations
85 F. App'x 888

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

Robert D. Whited, Jr., a Virginia inmate, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a state court unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue with respect to claims dismissed by a district court solely on procedural grounds unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’ ” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 , 120 S.Ct. 1595 , 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Whited has not made the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 , 123 S.Ct. 1029 , 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the *889 facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2004: 120042026peak 2004 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Whited v. Dotson, Warden543 U.S. 823 (2004)

Most recent

  1. Whited v. Dotson, Warden543 U.S. 823 (2004)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000) 41,948
Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322 (2003) 27,477
Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676 (4th Cir. 2001) 7,442

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list