TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

The King v. Philip Henry Rapp

The King v. Phillip Henry Rapp

The King v. Rapp, 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 9 (1764)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
April 1, 1764
Citations
1 U.S. 91 Dall. 9
Headnotes
Continuance.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion

Indictment for misdemeanor, in marrying a man to a woman who had another husband living. Moved, on the part of the defendant, to put off the trial, on affidavit of material witnesses wanting, and that he had taken the proper steps to get them. Opposed by the attorney-general, as being a criminal case, and not within the rules .of civil eases. But granted By the Court, the defendant being a clergyman, and his living depending on his acquittal: but declared not to be a precedent.

(b)

(b)

In Rex v. D’Eon, 3 Burr. 1513, the court said, that in all cases, whether criminal or civil, a trial shall not be hurried on, so as to do injustice to the defendant.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1764–1765: 117642026peak 1764 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. The LESSEE OF ALBERTSON v. Robeson1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 9 (1764)

Most recent

  1. The LESSEE OF ALBERTSON v. Robeson1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 9 (1764)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
The LESSEE OF ALBERTSON v. Robeson, 1 U.S. (1 Dall.) 9 (1764) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list