Phillips v. Hyde
Headnotes
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion
The Court overruled the evidence, (a)
A question then arose, whether the jury could include the costs which had accrued on the replevin, in their verdict in the present action. And the Court were clearly of opinion, that they could, and ought to do so.
(b)
Conformable to which was the verdict of the jury.
(a)
See Shewoll v. Fell; 3 Yeates 17 ; 4 Id. 47 .
(b)
Sergeant having suggested, that both the points in this case had been otherwise determined in a case of Jackson v. Webb, Mr. President Shippen said, that the matter was there left, upon equitable circumstances, to the court.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.