TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Commonwealth v. Addison

Commonwealth v. Addison, 4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 225 (1801)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 1, 1801
Citations
4 U.S. 2251 L. Ed. 8104 Dall. 2251801 U.S. LEXIS 109

Opinion

4 U.S. 225 (____) 4 Dall. 225

Commonwealth

versus

Addison.

Supreme Court of United States.

In support of the motion, the attorney-general.

But, by the COURT:

We are, unanimously, of opinion, that the case does not present to our consideration an indictable offence; and, of course, it is not a case, in which an information ought to be granted. But we are (with the same unanimity) of opinion, that every judge has a right, and, emphatically, that it is his duty, to deliver his sentiments upon every subject that occurs in Court. We add, so far as the expression of our sense of decorum may have weight, that we think, it would be indecent and improper, in any presiding judge, to attempt to prevent his associates from the exercise of this right; from the performance of this duty.

Motion refused.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1885–1886: 11943–1944: 11971–1972: 11973–1974: 118852026peak 1885 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Chaplin54 F. Supp. 926 (S.D. Cal. 1944)
  2. Solomon Feldman, Jr. v. State Board of Law Examiners438 F.2d 699 (8th Cir. 1971)
  3. Merriken v. Cressman364 F. Supp. 913 (E.D. Pa. 1973)
  4. Daly v. Mouroe2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 160 (1885)

Most recent

  1. Merriken v. Cressman364 F. Supp. 913 (E.D. Pa. 1973)
  2. Solomon Feldman, Jr. v. State Board of Law Examiners438 F.2d 699 (8th Cir. 1971)
  3. United States v. Chaplin54 F. Supp. 926 (S.D. Cal. 1944)
  4. Daly v. Mouroe2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 160 (1885)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list