TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hurst's Lessee v. Jones

Hurst's Lessee v. Jones, 4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 353 (1801)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 1, 1801
Citations
4 U.S. 3534 Dall. 353

Opinion

4 U.S. 353 4 Dall. 353 1 L.Ed. 864

Hurst's Lessee v. Jones.

Circuit Court, Pennsylvania District.

May Term, 1801 1

A FORMER ejectment, between the same parties, for the same land, had been non pros'd; but the costs of suit remained unpaid.

2

The defendant's counsel objected to the trial of the present ejectment, until the costs of the former were paid.

3

By the COURT.

4

The objection is reasonable and just. The defendant cannot, under such circumstances, be compelled to proceed to a trial.

5

The cause continued.

6

Rawle , for the plaintiff.

7

E. Tilghman , for the defendant.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1801–1802: 11895–1896: 118012026peak 1801 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lowe v. Kansas163 U.S. 81 (1896)
  2. Hollingsworth v. Duane4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 353 (1801)

Most recent

  1. Lowe v. Kansas163 U.S. 81 (1896)
  2. Hollingsworth v. Duane4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 353 (1801)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Hollingsworth v. Duane, 4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 353 (1801) 21

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list