Parle v. Runnels
Timothy Charles PARLE, Petitioner—Appellee v. David L. RUNNELS, in his capacity as Warden of the High Desert State Prison, in Susanville, Respondent—Appellant
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
MEMORANDUM **
The district court’s review de novo of the decision of the California Court of *760 Appeal was in error: that court, however imperfectly, conducted cumulative error review of the trial. In the light of the district court’s familiarity with the case, we remand for the district court to determine whether the decision of the state court was an objectively unreasonable application of Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 , 93 S.Ct. 1038 , 35 L.Ed.2d 297 (1973), Taylor v. Kentucky, 436 U.S. 478 , 98 S.Ct. 1930 , 56 L.Ed.2d 468 (1978), or other relevant Supreme Court precedent.
VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.