Ray v. Law
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion
Marshall, Ch. J.
We can do nothing, without seeing the record, and the papers offered cannot be considered by us as a record. „ _ *The court, however, is of opinion, that a decree for a sale under a -* mortgage, is such a final decree as may be appealed from. We suppose, that when the court below understands that to be our opinion, it will .allow an appeal, if it be a case to which this opinion applies.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(stating that “a decree for a sale under a mortgage[] is such a final decree as may be appealed from”)
Cited by 41 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court16
- U.S. Courts of Appeals11
- Historical Federal Courts1
- State Highest Courts12
- State Appellate Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- RSS WFCM2018-C44 - NY LOD, LLC v. 1442 Lexington Operating DE LLC
- MTGLQ Investors v. Wellington
- MTGLQ Investors v. Monica Wellington
- HSBC Bank USA v. Kirkland Townsend
- EMC Corporation v. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas And Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas
- Shuput v. Lauer
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.