TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ray v. Law

Ray v. Law, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 179 (1805)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 18, 1805
Judges
Marshall
Citations
7 U.S. 1792 L. Ed. 4043 Cranch 1791805 U.S. LEXIS 250
Headnotes
Appeal. — Final decree. A decree for a sale of mortgaged property, upon a bill to foreclose, is a final decree, from which an appeal will lie.1
Summary
Law having a mortgage on real estate in the city of Washington, and Ray having a subsequent mortgage on the same estate, Law had filed his bill in chancery in the Circuit Court of the district of Columbia, for a foreclosure .and sale of the mortgaged property, and made Ray a defendant. The bill Laving been taken for confessed against Ray, a decree was obtained by Law for a sale. The sale had been made under the decree, and notice given, that ■on a certain day, the sale would be ratified, unless cause was shown. On that ■day, Ray appeared, but not showing good cause, in the opinion of the court, the sale was confirmed. Ray prayed an appeal to this court, on the decree for the sale, which the court refused, on the ground, as it is understood, that -the decree for the sale was not a final decree in the cause. Ray, on this day, presented a petition to this court, setting forth those facts, among others, praying relief, and that this court would direct the court below to send up the record. At the same time, he produced sundry papers, purporting to be the substance of that record, but not properly authenti-eated. Marshall, Ch. J. — The act of congress points out the mode in which we .are to exercise our appellate jurisdiction, and only authorizes an appeal or writ of error on a final judgment of decree.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Marshall

Marshall, Ch. J.

We can do nothing, without seeing the record, and the papers offered cannot be considered by us as a record. „ _ *The court, however, is of opinion, that a decree for a sale under a -* mortgage, is such a final decree as may be appealed from. We suppose, that when the court below understands that to be our opinion, it will .allow an appeal, if it be a case to which this opinion applies.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 41 cases

View all citing references →
1805–1806: 11825–1826: 11833–1834: 11835–1836: 11841–1842: 21845–1846: 11847–1848: 11849–1850: 11857–1858: 21863–1864: 11865–1866: 11869–1870: 11871–1872: 11875–1876: 11881–1882: 31887–1888: 11889–1890: 11891–1892: 21893–1894: 11897–1898: 11899–1900: 11907–1908: 11915–1916: 11921–1922: 11927–1928: 11929–1930: 11957–1958: 11961–1962: 21981–1982: 22015–2016: 22021–2022: 22023–2024: 118052026peak 1881 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. HSBC Bank USA v. Kirkland Townsend793 F.3d 771 (7th Cir. 2015) · Dissent
  2. Brown Shoe Co. v. United States370 U.S. 294 (1962)
  3. Citibank, N. A. v. Data Lease Financial Corporation645 F.2d 333 (5th Cir. 1981)
  4. Keystone Manganese & Iron Co. v. Martin132 U.S. 91 (1889)
  5. Rector v. United States20 F.2d 845 (8th Cir. 1927)
  6. City of Boston v. Boston Edison Company, City of Boston v. Boston Edison Company260 F.2d 872 (1st Cir. 1958)

Most recent

  1. RSS WFCM2018-C44 - NY LOD, LLC v. 1442 Lexington Operating DE LLC59 F.4th 586 (2d Cir. 2023)
  2. MTGLQ Investors v. WellingtonNo. 20-2000 (10th Cir. Mar. 31, 2021)
  3. MTGLQ Investors v. Monica WellingtonNo. 20-2000 (10th Cir. Jan. 7, 2021)
  4. HSBC Bank USA v. Kirkland Townsend793 F.3d 771 (7th Cir. 2015) · Dissent
  5. EMC Corporation v. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas And Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of TexasNo. 03-15-00113-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Apr. 30, 2015)
  6. Shuput v. Lauer325 N.W.2d 321 (Wis. 1982)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list