Rush v. Parker
Opinion
9 U.S. 287 (1809) 5 Cranch 287
RUSH
v.
PARKER Supreme Court of United States.
March 15, 1809.
I.P. Boyd, for the defendant in error.
The court granted.
LIVINGSTON, J. thought that leave ought not to be given, on account of the delay it would produce. He had found a practice established here of receiving such affidavits; but he did not know of any case in which time had been given to produce them; and he would not consent to give it now. The case was *288 brought up to last term. The party ought to have come prepared to support the jurisdiction.
This being the last day of the term, and no affidavits having been produced,
The writ of error was dismissed, this court having no jurisdiction in the case.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.