TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Welsh v. Mandeville & Jamesson

Welsh v. Mandeville and Jamesson

Welsh v. Mandeville & Jamesson, 9 U.S. (5 Cranch) 321 (1809)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
February 1, 1809
Citations
9 U.S. 3213 L. Ed. 1135 Cranch 3211809 U.S. LEXIS 441
Headnotes
Thi* court «at cáu^’to^be heard, unleu aerveil^iiiy day «before the W*y °f **
Summary
YOUNGS, for the defendant in error, objected to the hearing of the cause at this term, the citation not having been. served thirty days before the first day of the term. The service was on the 12th of January, and the first day of the term was the 6th of February. contended, that it was to be. inferred from the case of Lloyd v. Alexander, ante, vol. 1. p. 365. that if the defendant appears within the thirty days, the court will hear the case; or they will hear the case, after the expiration of the thirty-days, even if the party does not appear. Youngs.. The 22d section of the judiciary act, vol. 1. p. 62. requires, that the defendant in error, should have thirty days’ notice by the service of the citation. The citation is to appear, on the first day of the. term, consequently thirty days’ notice must be by service of the citation thirty' days before the first day of the court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion

The. Court refused to tak'e up the case without, consent, although, thirty days had then (March 9, when the cause was called for hearing) elapsed since the.service of the citation; and observed, that the case of Lloyd v. Alexander only decided that fhe court will not take up the case until thirty days have expired since the service of the citation; but it did not decide that the court would then take it up without consent.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1905: 11989: 21991: 12008: 119052026peak 1989 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc.548 N.E.2d 153 (Ind. 1989)
  2. General Motors Corp. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue578 N.E.2d 399 (Ind. T.C. 1991)
  3. N. Ind. Pub. Serv. Co. v. CITIZENS ACT. COAL. OF IND.548 N.E.2d 153 (Ind. 1989)
  4. In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001No. 06-0319-cv(L) (2d Cir. Aug. 14, 2008)
  5. MacLennan v. Yee Chong2 D. Haw. 385 (D. Haw. 1905)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list