TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Young v. Grundy

Young v. Grundy, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 51 (1810)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
February 10, 1810
Judges
Marshall
Citations
10 U.S. 513 L. Ed. 1496 Cranch 511810 U.S. LEXIS 316
Cited by 41
Headnotes
No writ of error or appeallies to an injunction. if the answer neither admits ^legations of v™d on the Inai hearing; but ot'°1<i'¡ssoíuit¡on ofan injunction ®0t0 true,
Summary
THIS was an appeal from an interlocutory decree of the circuit court of the district of Columbia, dissolving an injunction. ■

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Marshall

Marshall, Ch. J.

If the.answer neither admits nor denies the allegations of the bill, they must be proved upon the final hearing. Upon a question of dissolution of an injunction they are to be taken to be true.

But the court has no doubt upon the question.

*52 No appeal, or writ of error will lie to an interlocutory decree dissolving an injunction. .

Writ of error dismissed with costs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 41 cases

View all citing references →
1816–1817: 11820–1821: 11822–1823: 11824–1825: 11826–1827: 21828–1829: 11830–1831: 11834–1835: 21842–1843: 21846–1847: 21848–1849: 31852–1853: 21860–1861: 11868–1869: 21872–1873: 11874–1875: 21876–1877: 11882–1883: 11884–1885: 11886–1887: 11888–1889: 11894–1895: 11896–1897: 11898–1899: 11900–1901: 11906–1907: 11916–1917: 11918–1919: 21954–1955: 12020–2021: 218162026peak 1848 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Robinson v. Cathcart2 D.C. 590 (1852)
  2. Brown v. Pierce74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 205 (1869)
  3. Moorman v. Beard154 F. 467 (6th Cir. 1907)
  4. Tatem v. Gilpin1 Del. Ch. 13 (Del. Ch. 1816)
  5. Wright v. Wright97 S.E. 358 (Va. 1918)
  6. (PC) Hammler v. GoochNo. 1:19-cv-00653 (E.D. Cal. June 3, 2020)

Most recent

  1. Rodriguez v. County of San JoaquinNo. 2:16-cv-00770 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2021)
  2. (PC) Hammler v. GoochNo. 1:19-cv-00653 (E.D. Cal. June 3, 2020)
  3. Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. Bodinger348 U.S. 176 (1955)
  4. Griffith v. State ex rel. Ainsworth210 S.W. 293 (Tex. App. 1919)
  5. Wright v. Wright97 S.E. 358 (Va. 1918)
  6. Semidey v. Izquierdo10 P.R. Fed. 114 (D.P.R. 1917)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list