TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Hill

United States v. Kali A. HILL, a/k/a Eldridge L. Hill, a/k/a Kali, a/k/a Fly

United States v. Hill, 332 F. App'x 832 (4th Cir. 2009)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 5, 2009
Docket
No. 08-6818
Judges
Gregory, Michael, Niemeyer
Citations
332 F. App'x 832

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kali A. Hill appeals the district court’s order summarily denying his motion to clarify the presentence report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See United States v. Hill, No. 2:03-cr-00162-PMD-1 (D.S.C. May 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list