TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lodge's Lessee v. Lee

Lodge's Lessee v. Lee, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 237 (1810)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 18, 1810
Citations
10 U.S. 2373 L. Ed. 2106 Cranch 2371810 U.S. LEXIS 336

Opinion

10 U.S. 237 6 Cranch 237 3 L.Ed. 210

LODGE'S LESSEE v. LEE.

February Term, 1810 1

EJECTMENT by Lodge against Lee, for part of an island in the Potomac river, called Eden , but now generally called Lee's island.

2

The plaintiff's lessor had taken up the land in the year 1804, as vacant, supposing that the defendant's claim must be bounded by the course and distance, allowing one degree of variation for every 20 years since the certificate of survey was made under which the defendant claims.

3

The defendant claimed under a patent from the lord proprietor of Maryland, dated in 1723, which granted to Thomas Lee 'all that tract or upper island of land, called Eden , lying and being in Prince George county, beginning at a bounded maple, near ten miles above the second falls, and opposite to a large run on the Virginia side called Hickory run , and standing upon a point at the foot of the said island, and running thence north sixty degrees, west sixty perches,' (&c. &c. giving the course and distance of every line to the beginning tree,) 'containing and laid out for 320 acres of land, more or less.' 4

The court below instructed the jury that the grant to Thomas Lee passed the whole of the island called Eden , and that the lessor of the plaintiff is not entitled to recover. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff; which opinion and judgment were, by this court, without argument, affirmed .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 26 cases

View all citing references →
1822–1823: 11830–1831: 11834–1835: 11842–1843: 11844–1845: 11854–1855: 11870–1871: 21876–1877: 11886–1887: 11892–1893: 11906–1907: 11908–1909: 11912–1913: 31916–1917: 11922–1923: 11926–1927: 11940–1941: 11944–1945: 11966–1967: 21974–1975: 11976–1977: 11982–1983: 118222026peak 1912 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State of Texas v. Balli190 S.W.2d 71 (Tex. 1944)
  2. Strong v. Delhi-Taylor Oil Corporation405 S.W.2d 351 (Tex. App. 1966)
  3. Mays v. Morrell132 P. 714 (Or. 1913)
  4. Conkling Mining Co. v. Silver King Coalition Mines Co.230 F. 553 (8th Cir. 1916)
  5. McIntyre v. Cameron117 S.E. 515 (S.C. 1923) · Dissent
  6. Drew v. Drew28 N.H. 489 (1854)

Most recent

  1. Stanley Spencer v. National Labor Relations Board712 F.2d 539 (D.C. Cir. 1983)
  2. Production Molded Plastics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board408 F. Supp. 937 (N.D. Ohio 1976)
  3. Schuler v. Federal Railroad Administration of United States Department of Transportation404 F. Supp. 920 (S.D.N.Y. 1975)
  4. Flast v. Gardner271 F. Supp. 1 (S.D.N.Y. 1967)
  5. Strong v. Delhi-Taylor Oil Corporation405 S.W.2d 351 (Tex. App. 1966)
  6. State of Texas v. Balli190 S.W.2d 71 (Tex. 1944)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Lodge's Lessee v. Lee, 10 U.S. 237 (1810) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list