TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

The Schooner Rachel v. The United States

The Schooner Rachel v. The United States, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 329 (1810)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 15, 1810
Citations
10 U.S. 3293 L. Ed. 2396 Cranch 3291810 U.S. LEXIS 348

Opinion

10 U.S. 329 6 Cranch 329 3 L.Ed. 239

THE SCHOONER RACHEL v. THE UNITED STATES.

February Term, 1810 1

THIS was an appeal from the sentence of the district court of the United States for the district of Orleans, which condemned the schooner Rachel for having traded with certain prohibited ports of St. Domingo, contrary to the act of congress.

2

The sentence of condemnation was passed, and the vessel sold, and the proceeds paid over to the United States, while the act was in force. The act had since expired. It was a case within the principle decided at last term, in the case of Yeaton and Young v. The United States , but it having been made a question whether the sale and payment over of the money did not prevent the operation of that principle, and there being also a question of jurisdiction, the cause stood over to this term for consideration.

3

The general question of jurisdiction of that court having been settled at this term in the case of Serre and Laralde v. Pitot and others , and the fact of the sale and payment over of the money being admitted, Martin and P. B. Key , for the claimants, prayed the court to direct that the proceeds should be paid over to the claimants.

4

But the court said that it was a matter to be left to the consideration of the court below. This court will only make a general order for restitution of the property condemned.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 23 cases

View all citing references →
1810–1811: 11842–1843: 11852–1853: 11858–1859: 11860–1861: 11882–1883: 21894–1895: 11902–1903: 21904–1905: 11908–1909: 11910–1911: 11912–1913: 11918–1919: 11928–1929: 11930–1931: 11932–1933: 11936–1937: 11946–1947: 11954–1955: 11972–1973: 218102026peak 1882 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Stone v. McKay Plumbing Co.26 So. 2d 349 (Miss. 1946) · Dissent
  2. Washington v. United States214 F.2d 33 (9th Cir. 1954)
  3. Mutual Life Ins. v. Lipp28 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1928)
  4. First Nat. Bank of Chattanooga v. Coffey96 S.W.2d 270 (Tenn. 1936)
  5. Jones v. Williams45 S.W.2d 130 (Tex. 1931)
  6. Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca Di Navigazione248 U.S. 9 (1918)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
The Brigantine Amiable Lucy v. The United States, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 330 (1810) 0

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list