Sabin v. Gilman
HENRY SABIN, ADMINISTRATOR OF A. DORMAN, versus COTTON GILMAN
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per curiam.
It has long been settled, in this state, that neither an executor nor an-administrator can prosecute an action in our courts by virtue of letters granted to him under the authority of another state. 3 Mass. Rep. 514 , Goodwin vs. Jones. — 1 Cranch 259 , Fenwick vs. Sears, admin *194 istrator. — 3 Cranch 319 , Dixon’s Executors vs. Ramsay’s Executors. The replication is insufficient, and the .defendant is entitled to judgment.
Judgmen t for the defendant.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.