Town of Conway v. Town of Wakefield
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
By the court.
An action is given by statute to a town, which relieves a pauper, with whose maintenance another town is chargeable ; “ Provided, that in all cases notice “ in writing, signed by a majority of said selectmen, or over-l! seers, and stating the sums expended by them for the re- “ lief of such poor person, shall be given, in the manner “ hereinafter mentioned, to the town, place, or person, “ chargeable by law with the maintenance of such poor per- “ son, within ninety days from the time the first relief shall il have been so afforded ; and such notice shall be served i( on the town, that may be chargeable, by the sheriff of the *278 ‘‘ county, in which such town lies, or his deputy, by leaving t£ an attested copy of such notice, -with his return thereon, “ with one at least of the selectmen, or overseers of the “ poor, and with the cierk of such town or place ; and upon “ any person, who may be chargeable, as aforesaid, by giv- “ ing him an attested copy of the notice, with his return “ thereon, or by leaving an attested copy thereof at his or “ her last and usual place of abode ; and the sheriff or depu- “ ty, serving the same, shall, within twenty days from the “ time of the service thereof, make a return of the original “ notice, with his doings therein, to the clerk of the court “ of common pleas for said county, &c. And no action shall “ be sustained against any town, or person, for any sums ex- “ pended as aforesaid, unless such notice has been given in “ the manner aforesaid.” 1 JV. //. Laws 360.
The question to be decided in this case is, whether a return of the notice, within the time prescribed by the statute, is a pre-requisite essentially necessary to the maintenance of the action ? In giving a construction to this stature, we have always adopted it as a rule, to follow the plam letter ; and it seems to us, that, taking the whole proviso together, the last clause, which declares, that no act ion shall be sustained, “ unless such notice shall be g;vcn in the man- “ ner aforesaid,” must be understood to mean a notice made in the form, served in the manner, and returned within the time, which the statute requires. We think, that the clause, respecting the return, is part of the proviso, and that a compliance with its requisitions is as essential, as a compliance With any other part of the proviso. Such being, in our opinion, the obvious meaning of the statute, títere must be Judgment on the non-suit,
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.