Mayhew v. Thatcher
Mayhew v. Thatcher Et Al.
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion
Mr. Chief Justice Marshall delivered the opinion of the Court, that as by the local laws and practice of Louisiana, questions of fact in civil cases were tried by the Court, unless either of the parties demanded a jury,, the interest upon the original judgment in Massachusetts might be computed, and make a part of the judgment in Louisiana, without a writ of inquiry and the intervention of a jury. And that although the original suit was commenced, by an- attachment, yet that the defendant, Mayhew, had personal notice of the suit, and afterwards appeared and took defence, so that. even, supposing there was any objection to the proceeding by attachment, it was cured, by the appearance of the defendant, and his litigating the suit.
Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 20 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court2
- Federal District Courts1
- State Highest Courts12
- State Appellate Courts1
- State Trial Courts4
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.