Browder v. McArthur
Browder v. M'Arthur
Headnotes
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion
The Court denied the motion, being of opinion that it was too late to grant a rehearing in a cause after it had been remitted to the Court below, to carry into effect the decree of this Court, according to its mándate; and that a subsequent appeal from the Circuit Court, for supposed error in.carrying into *59 effect such mandate, brought up only the proceedings subsequent to the mandate, and did not authorize an inquiry into the merits of the original decree.
Motion denied.
He cited 2 Madd. Chan.
390, 3 P. Wms. 8.
2
Atk.
439.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(“[N]either a State nor its officials acting in their official capacities are ‘persons’ under § 1983.”)
Cited by 36 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court9
- U.S. Courts of Appeals8
- Federal District Courts2
- State Highest Courts15
- State Appellate Courts1
- State Specialty Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.