TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

The Santa Maria

The Santa Maria. the Spanish Consul, Libellant

The Santa Maria, 20 U.S. (7 Wheat.) 490 (1822)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 14, 1822
Judges
Livingston
Citations
20 U.S. 4905 L. Ed. 5057 Wheat. 4901822 U.S. LEXIS 269
Headnotes
A question of fact respecting the proprietary interest in prize goods, captured by an armed vessel fitted out in violation of the statutes of ' neutrality of the-United States. Restitution to' the original Spanish owners decreed.
Summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Maryland. This was á libel filed in the District Court of Maryland, by the Consul of his Catholic Majesty for the port of Baltimore, in behalf of the Spanish owners of certain, goods alleged to have been captured on the high‘seas, and taken out of the Spanish ship Santa Maria, by the privateer Patriota, illegally armed and equipped in the United States. The evidence in the cause established the fact that the capturing vessel was owned by citizens of this country, and that she was armed, equipped, and fitted out, in violation of the laws and treaties of the United States. But there was some contrariety in the testimony as to the identity of the property, which the claimant, Burke, insisted upon his title to hold as a bona fide purchaser under a condemnation and sale in some prize tribunal at Galveztown. There was also some evidence tending to show that Burke was a part-owner of the capturing vessel. The District Court dismissed the libel, and ordered the property to be restored to the claimant, hut this decree was reversed by the Circuit Court, and the cause; was brought by appeal to this Court After this conclusive testimony, establishing the falsity of the claim and answer filed by Burke, need it be asked whether he is a worthy 'claimant? He is a citizen of the United States, calling on this Court to confirm to him the possession of goods, taken by a vessel fitted out by him in contravention of our laws, neutrality, aud solemn treaties : and this, too, not even under the colour of a commission from any power, acknowledged or unacknowledged.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Living

Mr. Justice Living&tqn delivered the opinion of the Court, and after stating the case, proceeded as follows ; ' In a casé of%ó palpable a fitting out and arming in an American port, and proceeding thence directly on a cruize, (whether with or without a commission, is in this case immaterial,) the counsel for the claimant and libellant was right in not attempting to justify the capture. He has therefore confined his endeavours to show the insufficiency of the evidence to establish *495 any title in the libellant, or in those whom he represents, to the merchandize in question.

The allegation of the libel is, that the property was part of the cargo of the Spa’nish ship Santa Maria, which was captured by the Patriota in the year 1817. The appellant says, there is no adequate proof of this fact. Without laying any stress on the register of this 'ship, which has been sent from the H avana, and to which the appellant has objected, there are four witnesses, and they are the only witnesses in the cause, whose relation is so uniform and particular as to leave no room to entertain doubt on any part of this transaction* Three of thenvwere.on board of the Patriota, at the time of her sailing on her illegal cruise. They establish, not only the unlawful armament of this vessel in the port of Baltimore,, but the capture of the Santa Maria, and that the sugars libelled are the identical sugars which were taken out of her, and put on board of the schooner Harriet, in which they were brought to Baltimore. The other witness, Causter, although not present at the capture, testifies, in thé most positive terms, and of his own knowledge, that the sugars libelled were part of the cargo of the Santa Maria. He speaks so much in detail on the subject, and. his means of information were so ample, that it is impossible he should be mistaken. Under these circumstances, and w'hen not a single witness has been examined to throw any doubt on the' subject, the Court perceives no reason for disturbing the sentence, of the Circuit Court, which is affirmed with costs.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1824–1825: 11864–1865: 11916–1917: 12014–2015: 12020–2021: 12022–2023: 12024–2025: 12026–2027: 118242026peak 1824 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. The Appam234 F. 389 (E.D. Va. 1916)
  2. The Fanny. The Consul-General of Portugal, Libellant22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 658 (1824)
  3. Stewart v. United States1 Ct. Cl. 113 (Ct. Cl. 1864)
  4. Alcantara v. Bakery & Confectionery Union & Indus. Int'l Pension FundNo. 12-4834-cv (L) (2d Cir. May 1, 2014)
  5. Blackhawk Network Incorporated v. SL Card Company IncorporatedNo. 2:21-cv-00813 (D. Ariz. Mar. 9, 2022)
  6. (PC) Singh v. California Substance Abuse Treatment FacilityNo. 1:21-cv-00139 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2021)

Most recent

  1. Rex Bagley v. Robert H. Thompson, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Nevada Division of Welfare and Supportive ServicesNo. 3:26-cv-00236 (D. Nev. Apr. 10, 2026)
  2. (HC) Martinez Santoyo v. BoydenNo. 2:23-cv-00447 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2024)
  3. Blackhawk Network Incorporated v. SL Card Company IncorporatedNo. 2:21-cv-00813 (D. Ariz. Mar. 9, 2022)
  4. (PC) Singh v. California Substance Abuse Treatment FacilityNo. 1:21-cv-00139 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2021)
  5. Alcantara v. Bakery & Confectionery Union & Indus. Int'l Pension FundNo. 12-4834-cv (L) (2d Cir. May 1, 2014)
  6. The Appam234 F. 389 (E.D. Va. 1916)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list