Devereaux v. Marr
Devereaux Against Marr
Devereaux v. Marr, 25 U.S. (12 Wheat.) 212 (1827)
Headnotes
[Practice.]
‘Phis Court cannot take jurisdiction ot a question, on which the opinions of the judges of the. Circuit Court are opposed, where the division of opinions arises upon some proceeding subsequent to the decision of the cause in that Court.
Summary
IN this case, the judges of the Circuit Court of West Tennessee, after a judgment had been rendered in that Court. divided in opinion upon the question as to the amount of the security bond, to be given by the party applying for a writ of error, whether the amount of the bond ought to be sufficient to cower the whole debt, or only for the costs and increased damages on the party failing to prosecute his writ Of error with effect. Whereupon the division of opinions was certified to this Court, under the 6th section of the Judiciary Act of the 29th April, 1802, ch. 291.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion
This Court was of opinion, that it had no jurisdiction of the question on which the opinions of the judges of -the Circuit Court were opposed, the division of opinions having arisen after the decision of the cause in that Court. .
Certificate accordingly
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 18 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court1
- U.S. Courts of Appeals5
- Federal District Courts4
- Bankruptcy Courts1
- State Highest Courts7
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.