TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States v. David Weisiger

The President, Directors & Co. of the Bank of the United States v. Weisiger, 27 U.S. (2 Pet.) 481 (1829)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 17, 1829
Citations
27 U.S. 4817 L. Ed. 4922 Pet. 4811829 U.S. LEXIS 415

Opinion

27 U.S. 481 2 Pet. 481 7 L.Ed. 441 7 L.Ed. 492

THE PRESIDENT, DIRECTORS AND COMPANY OF THE BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS v. DAVID WEISIGER, APPELLEE.

January Term, 1829 1

In this case, which had been argued on a previous day of the term, and the opinion of the Court delivered in favour of the appellants, (See ante, page 331) Mr Bibb having informed the Court that the defendant, Weisiger, had died since the commencement of the term; stated that he had been of counsel with the respondent, but he considered that his authority had expired by his death. He objected to the entry of a decree.

2

Mr Sergeant, for the complainants, moved the Court to cause the decree to be entered of a day in the term before the respondent's death; and he cited Davis vs. Davis, 9 Ves. 461. Campbell vs. Mesier, 4 Johns. C. R. 342. Asburnham vs. Thompson, cited 2 Mad. C. P. 529, as fully establishing the practice according to his motion.

3

Mr Bibb, contra.

4

The Court ordered the decree to be entered as of the first day of the term.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1850–1851: 11854–1855: 11874–1875: 11880–1881: 11884–1885: 11908–1909: 11916–1917: 11962–1963: 21982–1983: 11986–1987: 11990–1991: 218502026peak 1962 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Roll v. Howell73 So. 218 (Ala. Ct. App. 1916)
  2. Mitchell v. Overman103 U.S. 62 (1881)
  3. Leonard v. Abbott366 S.W.2d 925 (Tex. 1963)
  4. Bostrom v. Seguros Tepeyac, S.A.225 F. Supp. 222 (N.D. Tex. 1963)
  5. Huzjak v. United States118 F.R.D. 61 (N.D. Ohio 1987)
  6. De Agreda v. Mantel1 Abb. Pr. 130 (1854)

Most recent

  1. Opinion No.(Tex. Att'y Gen. July 31, 1990)
  2. Untitled Texas Attorney General OpinionNo. JM-1201 (Tex. Att'y Gen. July 2, 1990)
  3. Huzjak v. United States118 F.R.D. 61 (N.D. Ohio 1987)
  4. Flowers ex rel. Flowers v. Hyatt Regency Hotel1 N. Mar. I. Commw. 692 (1983)
  5. Bostrom v. Seguros Tepeyac, S.A.225 F. Supp. 222 (N.D. Tex. 1963)
  6. Leonard v. Abbott366 S.W.2d 925 (Tex. 1963)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
President of the Bank of the United States v. Weisiger, 27 U.S. (2 Pet.) 331 (1829) 12
President of the Bank of the United States v. Weisiger, 27 U.S. 481 (1829) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list