TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ward v. Gregory

George W. Ward, and Richard K. Call, Register and Receiver (U. S.), Appellants v. Lewis Gregory; Same, Appellants v. Jacob Robinson and F. Swearingen

Ward v. Gregory, 32 U.S. (7 Pet.) 633 (1833)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
February 16, 1833
Citations
32 U.S. 6338 L. Ed. 8107 Pet. 6331833 U.S. LEXIS 367
Disposition
Mr White moved to dismiss these cases, bn the grounds that the proceedings were at law in the courts of the United States for .the territory of Florida, and that they had been brought up from the court of appeals of that territory, by appeals instead of by writs of error.
Headnotes
A mandamus was issued by the superior court oi appeals of the eastern middle district of Florida, directed to the register and receiver of the western land district of Florida, commanding them to permit the entry and purchase of certain lands. From this proceeding, the register and receivér appealed to this court." The appeal was dismissed; the proceeding at mandamus being at common law, and therefore the removal to this court should have been by writ of error.
Summary
APPEALS from 'the court of appeals for the territory of Florida.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion

On thé 13th December 1826, on. the. application of the appellees to the superior court of appeals for the middle district, of Florida, a mandamus was issued directed to George W. Ward, the register, of the western land district of Florida, and to Richard K. Call, receiver of public moneys in said district, commanding them to permit the persons praying for the mandamus to enter and purchase certain sections of land, described, in the writ, under the provisions of the act of congress of the 22d of April 1826, which gave rights of pre-emption in the purchase of land to certain settlers in the states of Alabama and Mississippi, and the territory of Florida. From the superior court, the case was removed by a writ of error, to the court of Appeals for the territory of Florida; and, on the 21st of January 1831, the order of the superior court was affirmed by the court of. appeals. From this judgment the United States appealed to this court.

The court.ordered the appeal to be dismissed; the proceedings by mandamus being at common law, and therefore the cases should have been brought up by writs of error.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1875–1876: 11881–1882: 11895–1896: 21903–1904: 21917–1918: 11925–1926: 218752026peak 1895 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Carter County v. Schmalstig127 F. 126 (6th Cir. 1904)
  2. City of Cleveland v. United States ex rel. Cunningham127 F. 667 (6th Cir. 1904)
  3. Ex Parte Hoard105 U.S. 578 (1882)
  4. Smith v. Berryman199 S.W. 165 (Mo. 1917)
  5. Muhlenberg County v. Dyer65 F. 634 (6th Cir. 1895)
  6. State, ex rel. v. Bd. of Edn.152 N.E. 646 (Ohio 1926)

Most recent

  1. State, ex rel. v. Bd. of Edn.152 N.E. 646 (Ohio 1926)
  2. State ex rel. Carson v. Board of Education115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 55 (1926)
  3. Smith v. Berryman199 S.W. 165 (Mo. 1917)
  4. City of Cleveland v. United States ex rel. Cunningham127 F. 667 (6th Cir. 1904)
  5. Carter County v. Schmalstig127 F. 126 (6th Cir. 1904)
  6. Muhlenberg County v. Dyer65 F. 634 (6th Cir. 1895)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list