Norse v. City of Santa Cruz
Opinion
598 F.3d 1061 (2010)
Robert NORSE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF SANTA CRUZ; Christopher Krohn, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Santa Cruz; Tim Fitzmaurice; Keith A. Sugar; Emily Reilly; Ed Porter; Scott Kennedy; Mark Primack, individually and in their official capacities as Members of the Santa Cruz City Council; Loran Baker, individually and in his official capacity as Sergeant of the Santa Cruz Police Department; Steven Clark, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 07-15814.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 12, 2010.
David John Beauvais, Oakland, CA, Kathleen Elizabeth Wells, Esquire, Law Office of Kate Wells, Santa Cruz, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
George J. Kovacevich, Esquire, Atchison, Barisone & Condotti A. Professional Corporation, Santa Cruz, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(reversing summary judgment to Mayor where citizen “wanted to call attendees of the Council meetings as witnesses to testify about whether Norse actually disrupted them”)
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.