Dierking v. United States
IRWIN S. DIERKING v. United States
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
*144 The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover, in an opinion per ewriam, as follows:
.The plaintiff is clearly entitled to recover, as we have heretofore held in several different cases. Franz J. Jonitz v. The United States, 89 C. Cls. 155 ; Lyle M. Shields v. The United States, 90 C. Cls. 675 ; Charles D. McColl v. The United States, 90 C. Cls. 676 ; and Orville Jackson v. The United States, 90 C. Cls. 526 .
On authority of those cases judgment will be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $240.00. It is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.