TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Quillin v. United States

John A. Quillin, Jr. v. United States

Quillin v. United States, 228 Ct. Cl. 727 (Ct. Cl. 1981)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
United States Court of Claims · Federal Specialty Courts
Decided
June 19, 1981
Docket
No. 104-81C
Judges
Bennett, Nichols, Smith
Citations
228 Ct. Cl. 7271981 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 3461981 WL 21467

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. The issue presented is whether plaintiffs complaint has set forth any claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons discussed herein, we dismiss plaintiffs petition.

Plaintiff "Copyright” John A. Quillin, Jr. "1949” filed this petition on February 24, 1981, alleging false imprisonment and copyright infringement. From the papers submitted, it appears plaintiff believes he has copyrighted his name and claims some sort of false imprisonment by various government officials who have infringed his copyright. Plaintiff cites to the thirteenth amendment of the Constitution, the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights, and a Deed of Manumissions from 1863.

This is an unfortunate petition where plaintiff evidently has some grievance — be it real or imaginary — but has not presented any claim to this court on which relief can be granted. Any claim of false imprisonment sounds in tort and is beyond this court’s jurisdiction. E.g., Somali Develop *728 ment Corp. v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 741 , 508 F.2d 817 (1974). Additionally, we find no validity to the plaintiffs argument that a person can copyright his own name and claim that false imprisonment by the government has infringed that copyright.

Therefore, defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted and plaintiffs petition is dismissed.

Plaintiffs motion for rehearing was denied October 2, 1981.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
2004: 12015: 12018: 12019: 12021: 12022: 12023: 32026: 220042026peak 2023 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bernard v. United States59 Fed. Cl. 497 (Fed. Cl. 2004)
  2. Jackson v. United States612 F. App'x 997 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
  3. Samuel J. Burleson v. Texas Department of Criminal JusticeNo. 01-17-00565-CV (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 25, 2018)
  4. Turner v. United StatesNo. 19-141 (Fed. Cl. Sept. 10, 2019)
  5. Abdel-Malak v. United StatesNo. 20-715 (Fed. Cl. Oct. 14, 2021)
  6. Kaetz v. United StatesNo. 22-201 (Fed. Cl. Mar. 8, 2022)

Most recent

  1. Benavides v. United StatesNo. 26-1533 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 22, 2026)
  2. Alex Robert Harvey; Kathryn Ann Harvey; Steven Robert Johnson v. Meagan A. FlynnNo. 6:26-cv-00222 (D. Or. Apr. 21, 2026)
  3. Baqleh v. United StatesNo. 22-1887 (Fed. Cl. Apr. 6, 2023)
  4. Greene v. United StatesNo. 22-1754 (Fed. Cl. Feb. 21, 2023)
  5. Greene v. United StatesNo. 22-1754 (Fed. Cl. Feb. 21, 2023)
  6. Kaetz v. United StatesNo. 22-201 (Fed. Cl. Mar. 8, 2022)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Somali Dev. Bank v. United States, 508 F.2d 817 (Ct. Cl. 1974) 137

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list