Chouteau v. Eckhart

This court has jurisdiction, nuclei: the twenty-fifth section of the Judiciary act, in a Missouri land cause, where the title-is not'to be determined by Spanish iaws alone, b.ut where the construction of an act of Congress is involved to sustain thg title. . The obligation of perfecting titles under Spanish concessions, which was assuraetl by the United States in the Louisiana treaty, was • a political obligation, -to be carried out by the legislative department of the government. Congress, in confirming or rejecting claims, acted as the successor of the intendantgeneral; and both exercised, in this respect, a portion of sovereign power. The act of Congress, passed on the 13th of June, 1812, confirming the titles and claims of certain towns and villages to village lots and commons, gave a title which is paramount to a title held under an old Spanish concession, confirmed by Congress in 1836.

This case was brought up from the Supreme Court of the state of Missouri, by a writ of error issued under the 25th section of the Judiciary act of 1789. The facts were these: On the 11th of January, 1797, Charles Tayon presented the following petition: To Don Zenon "Trudeau, lieutenant-governor of the western part of Illinois, at St. Louis: Charles- Tayon, sub-lieutenant of infantry, pensioned by the king, captain of militia, commandant, under your orders, of the village of St. Charles, of Missouri, has the honour to pray you to grant him a tract of timbered land of six'arpens in width, fronting on the (marcies croché de la prairie bassé) Crooked swamp, in the low prairie, and extending to the Missouri, adjoining, on one side, to. Mr. Anf. Jams, and on the other side, to lands not heretofore granted ; favour which he expects of your justice. (Signed) Charles Tayon. St. Louis, 11th January, 1797. On the 23d of January, Trudeau returned the following answer: St. Louis, January 23, 1-797-. Having been informed that the land asked for, in order to procure-timber, is in no way fit to be improved, on account of the inundations to which it is subject every year, and that the timber thereon is only good to burn, and will renew itself in a short time, and therefore cannot be ruined, as the timber growing on the hills, which experience has shown will never grow up again; and the said land being in the vicinity of the village of St. Charles and of various farms, in the prairie of its dependency, which would have to go á great deal further tq procure wood; said tract shall remain (as well as all others adjoining, either in ascending or descending the Missouri, and which have been asked for by sundry petitions, addressed to us, together with the present, by Mr. Tayon) to the royal domain, and for the common use of the said village of St. Charles, and for the.lands already granted in the prairies, or to be granted hereafter: dll which Mr. Tayon shall make known to all the inhabitants, and especially to those who have asked for land, and whose petitions I herewith return. (Signed) Zenon, Trudeau. On the 17th of November, 1800, Pierre Chouteau applied for an augmentation of a'previous concession, as follows: To Don Carlos Dehault Delassus, lieutenant-colonel attached to the stationary regiment of Louisiana, and lieutenant-governor, of the upper part of the same province: Peter Chouteau, lieutenant of militia and commandant of the fort of Carondelet, in the Osage nation, has the' honour to represent to you, that formerly he obtained of Don Manuel Perez, lieutenant-governor of this part of Illinois, a concession for a tract of land of 10 arpens in front by as many in depth, to be taken on the left side of the Missouri, at about 20 arpens above St. Charles, upon which concession your petitioner has made all preparatory works for the construction of a water grist-mill, which was to be built on the creek comprised in his concession. The lieutenant-governor, Don Zenon Trudeau, was pleased to grant to your petitioner an augmentation to the said tract of 30 arpens in depth, all which is proven by the authentic documents necessary to this object. , The desi're of profiting of the favour which the general government granted to all those,; who presented their titles to obtain their ratification, caused your petitioner to address those same above-mentioned documents, to a friend át Néw Orleans, to whom probably they have not been remitted,.since .he could not effectuate their pre “ntation; the said original documents having not been registered in the archives of this government, your petitioner would be in great perplexity had he'not to offer to you'the attestation of Don Carlos Tayon, captain commanding the village of St. Charles, of Missouri, who at that time had a perfect knowledge of the original documents here above-mentioned, by virtue of which your petitioner was authorized' to begin an establishment for which he has made considerable sacrifice. Full of confidence in the justice and generosity of the government, he hopes that after the attestation you may be pleased- to take from the commandant of- St. Charles, you will have the goodness to ratify to him, and'in the place, the security óf' a properly which he has been enjoying for more than tén- years by virtue of the titles to -him expedited by your predecessors, and of- which he should wish that you would be pleased to order the surveyor of the Upper Louisiana to put him in possession in the following manner: to take two arpens below the creek comprised in his concession, and above said creek all the space- which is between the said creek and the next plantation, by the depth of forty arpens, in order that, being possessed of the certificate of' survey which shall be delivered to him, he may, if needed, have recourse to the superior authorities to obtain the- ratification of the said title. The petitioner presumes to hope every thing from your justice in -the decision of the case which he has the honour to submit to your tribunal. Pierre Chouteau. St. Louis of Illinois, 17th of November, 1800. On the 18th of November, 1800, Delassus referred the matter to Tayon, who replied as follows: St. Louis of Illinois, 11th of November, 1800. • Cognisance being taken of the foregoing statement, the sub-lieutenant in the royal army and captain of militia, commandant of the post of St. Charles, shall give, in continuation, information of all he. knows upon what is here asked. ■ Delassus.' In. compliance with the foregoing order, I do inform the lieutenant-governor that the statement of Don Pierre Chouteau is in all conformable to -truth, having had full knowledge of the titles mentioned by him in his petition, as well as of the considerable works he has done on said land, of which he has always been acknowledged as the proprietor. Charles Tayon.. St. Louis, 25th November, 1800. On the next day, the 26th of November, 1800, Delassus issued the following order: • St. Louis of Illinois, 26th November, 1800. Having seen the foregoing information and the just rights stated by Don Pedro Chouteau, to -whom an unexpected accident has deprived of his title of .concession, and considering that he has been for a long time proprietor of the land in question, the surveyor of this Upper Louisiana, Don .Antonio Soulard, shall put him in possession, in the manner solicited, of the tract of land he petitions for; and the survey being executed, he shall draw a plat of said survey, which he shall deliver to the interested party, to serve to the said party to obtain the title in form from the general intend encv. to which tribunal alone corresponds, by royal order, the distributing and granting all classes of lands of the royal domain. Carlos Dehaült Deeassps. On the 18th of January, 1801, the inhabitants of the village of St. Charles had a meeting and adopted the following proceedings: “In, the year eighteen hundred and one, on the 18th of January, at the request of Mr, Louis Barrada, syndic for the fences of this parish, we, Charles. Tayon, captain-commandant of the. said St. Charles, have given notice-at the door of this said church, that all the inhabitants of this place should have to assemble this day in our government (house), in order to determine whether the commons at the lower end should be increased or not. The said inhabitants being then assembled, and the question being under deliberation, they all unanimously agreed, that for the interest of the said parish, the enclosed of the lands shall begin {acoté) by the side of Mr. Antoine Lamarche, and it shall be continued in descenoing to, the Crooked swamp, all the way through the woods, to nearly opposite the house of the late Louis Hunault; thence it shall run in a straight line to the Missouri. “ The said inhabitants having thus determined on this head, it was agreed that the syndic on duty this year shall cause to be measured the quantity of arpens of land which are included in the new augmentation of the commons, in order lo {separter) distribute to each inhabitant what he is to do with it, according to the usages which have always been observed, without wronging any one whosoever in the said distribution. “It has been further agreed in the said assembly, that if hereafter the' commons of the upper end should need to be enlarged, in order to procure more pasturage for the cattle, all the said inhabitants {s’y porterons) shall help in'doing .the same, as thfe day they bind themselves to do for the lower emf) always without prejudice to any one whosoever. And as the said inhabitants-will not undertake- anything without the consent of .the lieutenant-governor, they have judged proper that the present deliberation should be communicated to him, and that he be supplicated to preserve to the said inhabitants.of St. Charles, of Missouri, their upper and lower commons, in their whole and entire state, and they will bind themselves to enclose the same as they have done heretofore, in order to preserve their grain and other property. “ Done and agreed upon in Our government (house), day and year as above. And all the said inhabitants have signed or made their customary marks.” On the 26th of February, 1801, Delassus made the following reply: St. Louis of Illinois, February 26th, 1801. All concessions and augmentations of property rdust be granted by the intendant of these provinces, on a petition which is to be presented by those persons claiming lands} but if the commons of the inhabitants of St. Charles is not sufficient for their cultivation, we do permit them, provisionally, to enlarge the same according to their wishes, without insuring to them the right of property, which they are to apply for as above mentioned. And the provisional lines of the said augmentation shall be drawn by Captain Antoine Soulard, surveyor of Upper Louisiana, who is the only person authorized to survey under our orders. It being well understood that nothing shall be done to'the prejudice of any person. (Signed) Carlos Dehaulov Delassus. On the 23d of February, 1804, Delassus issued another order as follows: C. — In consequence of the representation of the inhabitants of your post, which appears to me very just and well founded, after my decree of 26th February, in the year 1801, by which .the augmentation therein, mentioned is granted to them, and for which they have asked a survey by their petition of 27th April of the same year— which petition you have kept to this day without making it known to me, for which I hold you responsible — I apprize yoji-that the surveys made in the said place cannot belong to any individual, but to the commons of St. Charles. Therefore you shall notify those who have had surveys made in the said place of this disposition, and you shall take the necessary measures for the execution of the whole survey asked for by the said petition of 27th April, according to • the aforesaid decree of 26th February, in the. year 1801. May God have, you in his holy keeping. Signed in the original, Carlos Dehault Delassus. Mr. Charles Tayon. St, Louis of Illinois, '23d February, 1804. I certify that the above is a copy of the original, (official letter,) ■ addressed to Mr. Charles Tayon by the ex-eommander-in-chief of Upper Louisiana, Don Carlos Dehault Delassus, and presented to me by the citizens of note!of the village of St. Charles, while I was commandant of the said village. (Signed) James Mackay. On the 2d of March, 1804, the surveyor-general, Soulard, having made a survey and plat in conformity with the above order, issued the following certificate: • I, Anthony Soulard, surveyor-general. of Upper Louisiana, do hereby certify, that a tract of land was surveyed, meted, and bounded for, and in presence of, the syndic and inhabitants of St. Charles, (Missouri,) with the assistance of many of the inhabitants of said village, such as is represented in the plan hereto annexed, according to their petition therefore, dated January 18th, 1801, and the decree of the lieutenant governor, by which I am ordered to put them in possession of a sufficient quantity of land to serve them as a common; which surveys being completed, j find the said tract of land to contain 14,000 arpens, (superficial measure,) the admeasurement being made with the perch of Paris, of 18 pies in length, also Paris measure according to the usages or customs of this country; which tract of land is situate on the left side of the Missouri river, at about twenty-one miles from the town of St. Louis, bounded as follows, viz.: N. É., lands of the royal domain ; S. E., the river Missouri; S. W., partly by land of St. James d’Eglise; N. W., by sundries, namely, Francis Duquette, the inhabitants of Marias Croché, lands at the Mamelles, lands of various proprietors, and lastly, by lands of Frs. Duguette, Jo'seph Tayon, John Tayon, and royal domain. This survey and admeasurement made without noticing the variation magnetic needle, which is (now) 7° 30' E.; the whole as represented in the plan hereto prefixed, in which the courses, distances, metes, bounds, &c., are noted. This survey made in conformity to the decree of the late lieutenant governor, Ch. D. Delassus, dated February 26th, 1801, which is hereto annexed, the whole laid down from the field-notes of my deputy, James Mackay, dated on the 27th (day following) of the month-of February, of this present year, which I signed. St. Louis, March 2d, 1804. Anthony Soulard. Notes. — All the metes and comers are designated in the plan. All the trees -in the lines are blazed, with two notches below the blaze. Tne trees on the right and left of the lines are merely blazed. A. is a, tract of land subdivided among several persons, and called the Cul de Sac lands. C.’is a tract also granted to several persons, and called the Grand Prairie. I, Anthony Soulard, surveyor-general of Upper Louisiana, do hereby certify, that the above plan and notes of a survey agree in every part with the originals, which are filed in my office. Anthony .-Soulard, Surv. Gen. St. Louis of Illinois, March 2d, 1804. On the 2d of March, 1805, Congress passed an act u for ascertaining and adjusting the titles and claims to land within the territory of Orleans and the district of Louisianathe general purport of which was to .recognise all existing grants. It further provided for the appointment of three persons who should examine and decide on all claims submitted to them and report the result to the secretary of the treasury, who was directed to communicate it to Congress. On the 3d of February, 1806, the inhabitants of the village of St. Charles laid such of the above papers as relate to their title before the commissioners appointed under the act of 1805, and claimed a common for the general benefit'of the inhabitants. On the 3d of March, 1807, Congress passed another act relating to these land-titles, explanatory and corrective of the preceding act. B.oth claims, that of Chouteau and the inhabitants of the village, were presented to the commissioners, who rejected Chouteau’s and took-no notice of the claim of the inhabitants of the village. On the 13th of June, 1812, Congress passed another act “ making further provision for settling the claims to land in the territory of Missouriin which, amongst other, things, it is enacted, “ That the rights, titles, and claims to town or village lots, out-lots, common field lots, and commons, in, adjoining, and belonging to the several towns or villages of Portage des Sioux, St. Charles, &c., &c., &c., which lots have been inhabited, cultivated, or possessed prior to the 20th day of December, 1803, shall be, and the same are hereby confirmed to the inhabitants of the respective 4owns or-villages aforesaid, according to their several right .or rights in common thereto: provided, that nothing herein contained shall be construed to affect the rights of any persons claiming the same lands, or any part thereof, whose, claims have been confirmed by the board of commissioners for adjust-, ing and settling claims to land in the said territory.” In 1813 another act' was passed upon the subject, which does not appear to have any material, bearing upon the case. On the 26th of May, 1824, Congress passed another act “ enabling the claimants to lands within the limits of the state of Missouri and territory of Arkansas, to institute proceedings to try the validity of their claims.” It allowed any persons claiming lands under old grants or surveys, under certain circumstances, to present a petition to the District Court of the state of Missouri, which court was authorized to give a decree in the matter, reviewable, if need be, by the Supreme Court of the United States. The 5th section provided that a claim not before the District Court in two years, or not prosecuted to final judgment in three years, should be for ever barred, both at law and in equity; and the 7th section directed that where a claim tried under the provisions of. .the act, should be finally decided against the claimant, or barred by virtue of any of the provisions of the act, the land specified in such claim, should, forthwith, be held and taken as part of the public lands of the United States, subject to the same disposition as any other public land in the same district. This act- was Continued.in force by the act of the 26th May, 1826, for two years; and by the act of 24th May, 1828, it was continued in force for the purpose of filing petitions, until the 26th day of May, 1829, and for the ' purpose of adjudicating upon the claims, .until the -26th day of May, 1830. • Neither the claim of Chouteau nor the inhabitants of the village of St. Charles appears to have been presented to the District Court under any of these acts. On the 27th of January, 1831, Congress passed another act, being a supplement to the act of 1812, in which it was declared, “ That the United States do hereby relinquish to the inhabitants of the several towns or villages of Portage des Sioux, St. Charles, &c., See., Sec., all the right, title, and interest of the United States, in and to the town or village lots, out-lots, common field lots, and commons, in, adjoining, and belonging to the said towns or villages, confirmed to them respectively by the first section of the act of Congress, entitled, Sec., passed on the 13th day of June, 1812.” On the 9th of July, 1832, Congress passed “ an act for the final adjustment of 'private land-claims in Missouri,” which authorized commissioners to examine all the unconfirmed claims to land in that state, Sec. Sec., to class them, and at the commencement of each session of Congress during said term of examination, lay before the commissioner of the general land-office a report of the claims so classed, &,c., to be laid before Congress for their final decision upon the claims contained in the first class. On the 9th of November, 1832, Chouteau presented his claim to these commissioners, who, ■ on the 2d of November, 1833, unanimously determined that the claim ought to be confirmed to the said Peter Chouteau, or to his legal representatives, according to the concession. Before' this decision- was made, Congress, by an act passed on the 2d of March, 1833, had directed the commissioners to embrace every claim to a donation' of land, held in virtue of settlement and cultivation. On the 4th of July, 1836, Congress passed another act confirming claims to land in the state of Missouri, by which it was declared that the decisions in favour of land-claimants, made by the above commissioners were confirmed, saving.and reserving, however, to all adverse claimants, the right to assert the validity of their claims in a court or courts of justice; and the second section declared thptifi't should be found that any tract or tracts thus confirmed, or any part thereof, had been previously located by any other person or persons under any law of the United States, or had been surveyed or sold by the United States, the present aet should confer no title to such.lands in opposition to the rights acquired by such location or purchase, &c. &c. In January and February, 1837, Chouteau had the land surveyed, which he claimed under the above confirmation, and it was admitted upon the trial that this survey included the land in possession of Eckhart, for which the present ejectment was brought Chouteau having brought an ejectment, the cause came on to be tried in May, 1840. The defendant, Eckhard, endeavoured to show an outstanding title in the inhabitants of the village of St. Charles, under the grant for a Common. Upon the trial, the plaintiff, Chouteau, offered in evidence such of the facts above detailed as bear upon his title, and the defendant, .in' addition, gave the following evidence: He then proved, by Judge Spencer, that he (witness) came to St,' Louis in the winter of 1796; that he came to St. Charles in the winter of 1798; when he came to St. Charles, the town was surrounded by a fence. ’ The witness, looking on the plat of the survey of the commons, said that the claim of Spencer under Rybolt was granted to conform to the fence of the commons, and to have the fence of the commons as its northern line; and, looking upon the plat of survey given in evidence by the plaintiff, says the whole of the land covered-by the plaintiff’s claim, as laid down on that plat, was included in the commons fence, which was standing-when he came, here, and remained until after 1804. Mr. Cunningham, another witness of the defendant, said that he was a deputy-surveyor of the United States, and, as such, he has surveyed the.exterior lines of the commons of the town of St. Charles; that, in making such survey, he in some places found the lines of the Spanish survey, in others the timber was cut down, and, in prairie laird, no lines of courses could be found; and that the Spanish survey conformed to the plat given in evidence in this cause. This being all the evidence,, the court, on motion of the defendant, instructed the jury, that, “ if they believed, from the evidence, that the premises in controversy are included in the tract of land surveyed under the authority of the Spanish lieutenant-governor of Upper Louisiana, for the commons of the town of St. Charles, and held by the inhabitants of said town, and enclosed by them as their commons, under the Spanish government, the plaintiff cannot recover in this actionto which instruction the plaintiff, by his counsel, excepts,- and prays the court to sign this his bill of exceptions, which is done, and the same is made part of the record. Both plaintiff and defendant gave in evidence sundry acts of Congress, and defendant gave'in evidence a private act of the legislature of the state of Missouri, which they, agree shall not be set out in the bill of exceptions, but may be read, and considered evidence in the Supreme Court, as if here inserted. The jury, under this instruction found a verdict for the defendant. The case was carried to the' Supreme Court of Missouri, where the judgment was affirmed, from which it was brought, by writ of error, to this court.