Quantity of Iron
Quantity of Iron, 20 F. Cas. 120 (D. Mass. 1862)
Headnotes
Case No. 11,496.
Salvage — Unnecessary Interference by Third Parties.
Persons who interfere unnecessarily with wrecked property, which is being saved under a contract between the owners thereof and a third party, cannot claim as salvors, although they bring the property into port.
Summary
The ship Mantua was wrecked, near the entrance of Boston harbor, in the fall of 1861. The libellant then made an agreement with the owners of the vessel and cargo, to save what he could, and to receive one-half of the proceeds as compensation. While performing this service, two schooners came to the place and began to pick up the cargo. The libellant notified them that he had the exclusive right to salve the vessel and cargo, and forbade their interfering: but they refused to desist, and picked up and brought to Boston a quantity of bolt and bar iron. The libellant then filed his libel against it, alleging that under the agreement, he had the exclusive right to salve the property; that the masters of the schooners had no right to interfere, and having been warned off, must be considered as intruders and wrongdoers; that they had no claim for compensation or salvage on the property they picked up; that their services and labor inured to him; that he was entitled to the same salvage upon this iron as upon the cargo which he saved; and prayed for a decree accordingly. An answer was filed for the owners, admitting the facts as alleged by the libellant, and his rights as claimed. The masters of the schooners were notified of the pendency of the suit, but did not appear.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
BY ORDER OF THE COURT,
a decree was entered for the libellant, allowing him fifty per cent, of the proceeds of the iron as salvage, according to the prayer of the libel, -and the.balance was ordered to be paid to the -owners.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.