TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State of Florida v. State of Georgia

The State of Florida, Complainant, v. the State of Georgia Bill in Chancery

Florida v. Georgia, 52 U.S. (11 How.) 293 (1851)
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 14, 1851
Citations
52 U.S. 29313 L. Ed. 70211 How. 2931850 U.S. LEXIS 1510
Headnotes
A bill by the State of Florida against the State of Georgia ordered to he filed, .and process of subpoena directed to be issued against the State of Georgia.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion

Messrs. Johnson and Westcott, solicitors for the complainant, moved the court for leave to file the bill of complaint in the cause and for a writ of subpoena, or such process as to the court may seem proper. Whereupon this court, not being now here sufficiently advised of and concerning what order to render in the premises, took time to consider.

- On consideration of the motion made in this case yesterday, by the solicitors for the complainant, it is now here ordered by the court that this bill of complaint be filedr and that process of subpoena be, and the same, is hereby, awarded, as prayed for by the complainant, and that said process issue against “ The .State of Georgia/’

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1900: 11902: 11918: 119002026peak 1900 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Missouri v. Illinois & the Sanitary District180 U.S. 208 (1900)
  2. Virginia v. West Virginia246 U.S. 565 (1918)
  3. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Frost89 N.W. 915 (Wis. 1902)

Most recent

  1. Virginia v. West Virginia246 U.S. 565 (1918)
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Frost89 N.W. 915 (Wis. 1902)
  3. Missouri v. Illinois & the Sanitary District180 U.S. 208 (1900)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list