Richardson v. Norcross
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
McGUIRE, District Judge.
I cannot conclude that the alleged mark “Susie Cucumber” is confusingly similar to the co-defendant Norcross’ registered trade-mark, as one is for letters and the other for greeting cards which are purchased over the counter, while the letters have to be ordered.
However, plaintiff’s suit must be dismissed for the reason that the name ■“Susie Cucumber” is incapable of registration as a trade-mark, since it is used as plaintiff’s pseudonym and signature and not as a true trade-mark. This case is disposed of it seems to me by In re Page Co., 47 App.D.C. 195 .
The words Susie Cucumber being the title of a book and a series of letters is descriptive, and as a consequence unregistrable.
Counsel will prepare proper papers.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.