TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Marshall Metal Products, Inc. v. Aghnides

MARSHALL METAL PRODUCTS, Inc. and The Meyer's Company v. Elie P. AGHNIDES

Marshall Metal Prods., Inc. v. Aghnides, 126 F. Supp. 849 (S.D.N.Y. 1953)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, S.D. New York · Federal District Courts
Decided
October 8, 1953
Judges
Weinfeld
Citations
126 F. Supp. 849103 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 1751953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2005

Opinion of the Court — Weinfeld

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

WEINFELD, District Judge.

It is clear that a patentee and a manufacturer charged with infringement are engaged in forum shopping. Joined with them is a retailer, the sole defendant in a prior action brought by the patentee in the Middle District of North Carolina, where the retailer is engaged in business. After the North Carolina action had been pending for three months, the manufacturer, joined by the North Carolina retailer as co-plaintiff, commenced this declaratory judgment action of invalidity. Issue has not yet been joined in this action. The North Carolina action is set for trial five days hence. The North Carolina action is the only pending suit brought by the patentee against a retailer, an affiliate of one of America’s largest buying organizations. The agreement by the manufacturer to indemnify the retailer against all expenses incurred in defending the North Carolina action assures a vigorous defense there.

The institution of this suit by the manufacturer and the retailer appears to have been a maneuver upon which to predicate the present motion for a stay of the North Carolina action. Moreover, it is noted that a motion made by the defendant-retailer in the North Carolina action two weeks after the commencement of this suit to stay that action, i. e., the one in North Carolina, until the final determination of this action, was denied. To grant its present motion will result in overcoming the force of that ruling.

In the exercise of discretion the parties are left in their respective positions except that the retailer in the action pending in this district, the sole defendant in the North Carolina action, is stayed from taking any action or proceeding in this suit pending the final determination of the issues by the District Court in North Carolina.

Except as indicated, the respective motions for stays are denied.

Settle order on notice.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1954: 11976: 119542026peak 1954 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ransburg Corp. v. Automatic Finishing Systems, Inc.412 F. Supp. 1357 (E.D. Pa. 1976)
  2. Marshall Metal Products, Inc. v. Aghnides126 F. Supp. 850 (S.D.N.Y. 1954)

Most recent

  1. Ransburg Corp. v. Automatic Finishing Systems, Inc.412 F. Supp. 1357 (E.D. Pa. 1976)
  2. Marshall Metal Products, Inc. v. Aghnides126 F. Supp. 850 (S.D.N.Y. 1954)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list