TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Walls v. United States

Benson WALLS v. United States

Walls v. United States, 137 F. Supp. 518 (N.D. Fla. 1955)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, N.D. Florida · Federal District Courts
Decided
April 5, 1955
Docket
No. 478
Judges
Vane
Citations
137 F. Supp. 51848 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 11951955 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2322

Opinion of the Court — Vane

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

DE VANE, Chief Judge.

This is a suit to recover certain transportation taxes paid by the plaintiff to the defendant under the provisions of 26 U.S.C. § 3469 , prior to its amendment on October 20, 1951, exempting from such taxes boat transportation for merely fishing purposes.

From the pleadings and evidence the Court finds that between June, 1948, and September, 1951, inclusive, the plaintiff operated a deep sea fishing boat for hire, and that his charge to his fisherman-passengers was $5.50 per person per day.

That between 15 July 1948 and 29 October 1951 in accordance with certain returns of the transportation tax filed by the plaintiff and at various times during such period, the plaintiff made tax payments, which aggregated the sum of $477.75, sued for herein.

The Court finds further, however, from the plaintiff’s affidavit dated 22 October 1954 that such taxes were paid by the plaintiff from the moneys received by him on account of his charges to his fisherman-passengers and that such taxes were not collected as such from such persons. No proof to the contrary was submitted by the defendant.

That thereafter, administrative claims for the refund of such taxes aforesaid were filed on behalf of the plaintiff but were disallowed.

In the case of Smith v. United States, D.C., 110 F.Supp. 892 , this Court held on 31 March 1953 that the transportation tax involved herein was illegal, insofar as this type of passenger-fishing boat operation was concerned.

Accordingly, a judgment in conformity with these findings and conclusions will be entered for the plaintiff.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1955: 11961: 119552026peak 1955 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Thomas J. McGowan v. United States296 F.2d 252 (5th Cir. 1961)
  2. Walls v. United States144 F. Supp. 440 (N.D. Fla. 1955)

Most recent

  1. Thomas J. McGowan v. United States296 F.2d 252 (5th Cir. 1961)
  2. Walls v. United States144 F. Supp. 440 (N.D. Fla. 1955)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Smith v. United States, 110 F. Supp. 892 (N.D. Fla. 1953) 14

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list