TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gemological Institute of America, Inc. v. Riddell

GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, Inc., an Ohio Corporation v. Robert A. RIDDELL, Director of Internal Revenue at Los Angeles, California

Gemological Inst. of Am., Inc. v. Riddell, 149 F. Supp. 137 (S.D. Cal. 1957)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, S.D. California · Federal District Courts
Decided
February 20, 1957
Docket
No. 20159
Judges
Yankwich
Citations
149 F. Supp. 13750 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 19241957 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3837

Opinion of the Court — Yankwich

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

YANKWICH, Chief Judge.

The above-entitled cause heretofore tried, argued and submitted, is now decided as follows:

Upon the grounds stated in the Comments to follow, Judgment will be for the plaintiff for the recovery of the penalty only.

Formal Findings and Judgment to be prepared by counsel for the Government under Local Rule 7, West’s Ann.Cal. Code. Exact computation of the amount to be recovered to be made under Local Rule 7(h).

Comments

Reference is made to Comments I and II in Gemological Institute of America, Inc., v. Riddell, D.C., 149 F.Supp. 128 .

III As to this case, I am of the view that the accrual of the trust fund should have been made at the rate of $10,000 per year beginning with the year 1952. The amount was payable in yearly installments of $10,000 and only on default could the whole balance become due in any one year. I also hold that the taxpayer, in paying, the back taxes, not having designated the application of the payment to specific years and taxes, the Collector was justified in applying them as he did, both under the general law (70 C.J.S., Payment, § 57; Dubois National Bank v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 3 Cir., 1947, 161 F.2d 132, 137 , opinion written by Circuit Judge Albert Lee Stephens of our own Circuit) and under California law, California Civil Code, § 1479, subd. 2.

For Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Judgment, see 149 F.Supp. 132 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1957: 11966: 11983: 119572026peak 1957 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Joseph Datlof v. United States370 F.2d 655 (3d Cir. 1966)
  2. Wollman v. United States571 F. Supp. 824 (S.D. Fla. 1983)
  3. Gemological Institute of America, Inc. v. Riddell149 F. Supp. 138 (S.D. Cal. 1957)

Most recent

  1. Wollman v. United States571 F. Supp. 824 (S.D. Fla. 1983)
  2. Joseph Datlof v. United States370 F.2d 655 (3d Cir. 1966)
  3. Gemological Institute of America, Inc. v. Riddell149 F. Supp. 138 (S.D. Cal. 1957)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Gemological Inst. of Am., Inc. v. Riddell, 149 F. Supp. 128 (S.D. Cal. 1957) 13
Du Bois Nat. Bank v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 161 F.2d 132 (3d Cir. 1947) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list