TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Best v. American National Growers Corp.

Martin BEST, Jr. v. AMERICAN NATIONAL GROWERS CORPORATION

Best v. Am. Nat'l Growers Corp., 197 F. Supp. 170 (E.D.S.C. 1961)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, E.D. South Carolina · Federal District Courts
Decided
September 13, 1961
Docket
No. AC/793
Judges
Wyche
Citations
197 F. Supp. 170

Opinion of the Court — Wyche

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

WYCHE, District Judge.

The above case was commenced in the court of common pleas for Barnwell County, South Carolina, and removed by the defendant American National Growers Corporation (now known as Blue Goose Growers, Inc.) to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina, on August 10, 1961, upon the ground of diversity of citizenship and jurisdictional amount.

The complaint at the time of the removal of the action to this court sought damages in the amount of $25,000. After the removal of the cause to this court the plaintiff on August 17, 1961, served upon the defendant an amended complaint reducing the ad damnum from $25,000 to $9,500.

The ease is before me upon the motion of the plaintiff to remand the case to the court of common pleas for Barnwell County upon the ground that the amount involved in this controversy after the service of the amended complaint is less than $10,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and, also, upon the motion of the defendant to dismiss the amended complaint.

Plaintiff may under the Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 15, serve an amended complaint on the defendant at any time before answer. However, it is well settled that a plaintiff cannot by amendment reduce the ad damnum in order to defeat federal jurisdiction after the removal of a cause from the state court to the federal court. Hayward v. Nordberg Mfg. Co., 6 Cir., 85 F. 4 ; Daland v. Hewitt Soap Co., D.C., 27 F.Supp. 482 ; St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U.S. 283 , 58 S.Ct. 586 , 82 L.Ed. 845 .

The motion to remand must, therefore, be denied.

Therefore, it is ordered, that the motion to remand be and the same is hereby denied.

It is further ordered, that the motion to dismiss the amended complaint be and the same is hereby denied.

The answer of the defendant to the complaint will stand as the answer of the defendant to the amended complaint.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1966: 11979: 11982: 119662026peak 1966 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Jacks v. Torrington Company256 F. Supp. 282 (D.S.C. 1966)
  2. McGann v. Mungo578 F. Supp. 1413 (D.S.C. 1982)
  3. Jones v. Beasley476 F. Supp. 116 (M.D. Ga. 1979)

Most recent

  1. McGann v. Mungo578 F. Supp. 1413 (D.S.C. 1982)
  2. Jones v. Beasley476 F. Supp. 116 (M.D. Ga. 1979)
  3. Jacks v. Torrington Company256 F. Supp. 282 (D.S.C. 1966)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Saint Paul Mercury Indem. Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U.S. 283 (1938) 3,912
Hayward v. Nordberg Mfg. Co., 85 F. 4 (6th Cir. 1898) 31
Daland v. Hewitt Soap Co., 27 F. Supp. 482 (S.D.N.Y. 1939) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list