TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bank of Topeka v. Eaton

Bank of Topeka v. Eaton, 107 F. 1003 (1st Cir. 1901)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 5, 1901
Docket
No. 342
Judges
Brown, Circuir, Colt, Ter, Webb
Citations
107 F. 100347 C.C.A. 1401901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4053
Summary
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Ter

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

TER CURIAM.

This court concurs in the reasoning of Judge Putnam, holding that the declaration is insufficient and sustaining the demurrer. Our conclusion therefore is, and it is so ordered, that the judgment of the circuit court he affirmed, with costs for the defendants in error. 100 Fed. 8 . The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs for the defendants in error.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1924: 119242026peak 1924 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Victor Refining Co. v. City Nat. Bank of Commerce263 S.W. 622 (Tex. App. 1924)

Most recent

  1. Victor Refining Co. v. City Nat. Bank of Commerce263 S.W. 622 (Tex. App. 1924)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Bank of Topeka v. Eaton, 100 F. 8 (1900) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list