TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kursheedt Mfg. Co. v. Naday

KURSHEEDT MFG. CO. v. NADAY SAME v. ADLER

Kursheedt Mfg. Co. v. Naday, 108 F. 918 (2d Cir. 1901)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 24, 1901
Docket
Nos. 116, 117
Judges
Lacombe, Shipman, Wallace
Citations
108 F. 91848 C.C.A. 1401901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3839
Cited by 4
Headnotes
Costs — Appellate Proceedings — Printing Brief. Unless provided for by special rule, tbe cost of printing briefs on appeal will not be allowed as part of the taxable costs or disbursements.
Summary
Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. On motion to tax cost of printing brief.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

The rule in this court for many years has been not to allow the sum paid for printing briefs or arguments as part of the taxable costs or disbursements, except when specially provided for by rule. In this respect the practice conforms, to that of the supreme court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →
1912: 11918: 21967: 119122026peak 1918 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bond v. United Railroads128 P. 786 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912)
  2. United States v. Thlinket Packing Co.6 Alaska 117 (D. Alaska 1918)
  3. Bailey v. Mississippi Home Telephone Co.254 F. 358 (M.D. Penn. 1918)
  4. Joseph Scaduto v. Anthony J. Orlando, D/B/A A. J. Orlando Contracting Co.381 F.2d 587 (2d Cir. 1967)

Most recent

  1. Joseph Scaduto v. Anthony J. Orlando, D/B/A A. J. Orlando Contracting Co.381 F.2d 587 (2d Cir. 1967)
  2. Bailey v. Mississippi Home Telephone Co.254 F. 358 (M.D. Penn. 1918)
  3. United States v. Thlinket Packing Co.6 Alaska 117 (D. Alaska 1918)
  4. Bond v. United Railroads128 P. 786 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list