TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lewis v. Campau

Lewis v. Campau, 70 U.S. (3 Wall.) 106 (1866)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 12, 1866
Citations
70 U.S. 10618 L. Ed. 2113 Wall. 1061865 U.S. LEXIS 691
Syllabus
A final judgment or decree by the highest court of law or equity of a Stats that revenue stamps attached to a deed offered in evidence and objected to as not having stamps proportioned to the value of the land conveyed are sufficient — is not a subject for review by this court under the 25th section of the Judiciary Act of 1789.
Summary
Campau sued Lewis in the Supreme Court of Michigan, “ the highest court of law and equity” in that State; and on the hearing there, objection was made to the admissibility of a deed which was offered in evidence, on the ground that the United States revenue stamps attached to it were not sufficient in amount; that is to say, were not proportioned in amount to the value of the land conveyed; as the act of Congress relating to our internal revenue requires that they should be; and that the deed was therefore void. The court being satisfied that the value of the land was not sufficient to require stamps of greater amount than were actually attached admitted the deed; and final judgment having gone in favor of Lewis, the other party, Campau, brought the case here on error as being within the 25th section of the Judiciary Act of 1789; a section which enacts that a final judgment or decree in any suit in the highest court of law or equity in a State wherein is drawn in question the validity of a statute of the United States and the decision is against its validity; or where is drawn in question the construction of any clause of a statute of the United States and the decision is against the title, right, or privilege specially set up or claimed by either party — may he re-examined here

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion

The CHIEF JUSTICE:

Neither the validity of the statute, nor its construction was in any way drawn in question. The only question the court had to pass upon, and this only *107 incidentally as affecting the admissibility of evidence, was the value of the land.

This is not a question which can be brought into this court under the 25th section of the Judiciary Act.

Writ of error dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1889: 11894: 118892026peak 1889 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Dower v. Richards151 U.S. 658 (1894)
  2. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Hopkins130 U.S. 210 (1889)

Most recent

  1. Dower v. Richards151 U.S. 658 (1894)
  2. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Hopkins130 U.S. 210 (1889)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list